|
|
Industry
Ears, Parents Television Council making it hard for
media execs
Stanley Crouch
Daily News
June 22, 2008
Direct action has its benefits and its irritation.
Paul Porter knows this well. A former programmer for
Black Entertainment Television, the infamous BET, he is
now a member of Industry Ears, a nonprofit watchdog
agency that he co-founded with Lisa Fager in 2004. It is
dedicated to cleaning up those aspects of popular
culture in which irresponsible material is aimed at
children.
Porter's most recent victory was over Motown Universal
when he organized a protest against a slick trash video
promoting Ashanti's new recording. The protest was to be
held at the fifth game of the NBA Finals. That would put
the problem in a high-profile position.
Ashanti was to sing the national anthem and Porter's
people would have been outside of the arena protesting
the league's choice of a woman who was advertised in an
ad designed to titillate with violence.
Sylvia Rhone, the black woman at the top, must have
howled before firing off an e-mail announcing to Porter
that the ad would be discontinued. She might well have
commiserated with Debra Lee, who is at the top of the
BET executive pyramid that has sailed atop a garbage
scow for some time now, making it clear that it is all
about the Benjamins. After all, black people should be
free to make money, too. Don't forget this is a
capitalist society.
But it is, just like the fate of pimps, getting hard out
here for a black businesswoman. Especially since Procter
& Gamble, Pepsi, Wal-Mart and General Motors have just
pulled ads from BET rap programming. Porter believes it
is the result of "The Rap on Rap," a study done by the
Parents Television Council (parentstv.org), another
watchdog organization which has on its Web site this
statement: "Children who watched BET's 'Rap City' and
'106 & Park' and MTV's 'Sucker Free' were bombarded with
adult content - sexual, violent, profane or obscene -
once every 38 seconds."
PTC President Tim Winter said, "BET and MTV are
assaulting children with content that is full of
sexually charged images, explicit portrayals of
violence, drug, drug sales and other illegal activity."
Most importantly, perhaps, is the fact that Winter noted
with the exception of one program on BET, neither BET
nor MTV carried content descriptions that would work in
conjunction with the V-Chip to block the programs from
coming into the homes of parents or warn them about the
presence of sexual content, suggestive dialogue,
violence or foul language.
Some of the pigs oinking at the trough on the garbage
scow of popular entertainment are employed by Fox, that
fount of self-righteous right-wing falsehood. The FCC
fined Fox $91,000 for an episode of "Married by America"
that aired on April 7, 2003. Hmm. Seems like Fox broke
the decency code. As one would expect, Fox protested the
ruling and filed a motion against it. I guess it's
getting hard out here for a network executive willing to
slime our kids.
The issue is neither right nor left. It is about
protecting the children.
The point is not denying sex or violence or brutal, even
hateful, language. We know they have all been used by
serious artists to tell us true and sometimes disturbing
things about ourselves. That is very different from
pretending that the freedoms artists have gained against
the puritanical censorship of work intended for adults
should be irresponsibly applied to work intended to do
nothing more than exploit or titillate our children by
pushing them into areas that they are not mature enough
to handle.
But, finally, if it's truly all about the Benjamins, our
popular culture will begin to clean itself up when its
makers begin to lose money. I think we are seeing some
of that right now.
|
|
|
STAY INFORMED |
|
|
| |
Subscribers receive no more
than
1-2 emails per week |
|
|
|
|
|
This article is copyrighted material, the use of
which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We
are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided
for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17
U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes. For more
information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If
you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your
own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner |