Tobacco Product Placements on the Downturn

Product Placement News
January 2, 2009

Moviegoers are accustomed to the “no animals were harmed” disclaimer at the end of most movies. But 2009 dawns a new age for disclaimers, product placement disclaimers in particular.

From now on, the screen will also flash “The depictions of tobacco smoking contained in this film are based on artistic consideration and are not intended to promote tobacco consumption.” Warner Bros. films add, “No tobacco companies paid for produc0t placement.”

Most experts conclude that studios don’t want to be associated with the promotion of bad health practices. But, what does this mean for the tobacco manufacturers? While putting disclaimers is an exercise of corporate social responsibility, will it be effective?

In Singapore, cigarette packs are imprinted with awful images of lung cancer. However, these warnings do not sway “die-hard” smokers. The bottom line is when studios show characters smoking, it still encourages smoking. The new disclaimer simply washes the hands of the studios and makes cigarette smoking look “cooler.”

This article is copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner