Webkinz Takes Heat For Taking Advertising
Karlene Lukovitz
MediaPost Publications
December 14, 2007
IN THE LATEST BATTLE OVER advertising to kids, The
Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood (CCFC) has
announced that it's demanding that Webkinz World, the
phenomenally successful social networking site for kids
who have bought Webkinz stuffed animals, "stop targeting
its users with outside advertising." As every family
with kids and a computer knows by now, Webkinz are plush
animal toys that come with a code enabling children to
create digital avatars that look like the animal and
interact in all kinds of ways within Webkinz World.
CCFC, a Boston-based national coalition of health-care
professionals, educators, advocacy groups and parents
seeking to shield children from exposure to advertising
and commercialism, has launched a letter-writing
campaign to Howard Ganz, CEO of privately held,
Toronto-based Webkinz parent company Ganz. CCFC is
urging parents to sign and launch a pre-written email
letter on its Web site that asks Ganz to rethink his
company's "unfortunate decision" to begin taking
advertising.
The letter reads in part: "Many parents purchase Webkinz
toys for their children with the expectation that
Webkinz.com is free of outside advertising and links.
Ganz has benefited from Webkinz' reputation as an
advertising-free site. Surely the Webkinz brand has been
extremely profitable for Ganz without selling its young
users to advertisers."
In a press release about the letter-writing campaign,
Susan Linn, CCFC's director and a psychologist at Judge
Baker Children's Center, maintained that Ganz "was
already walking a fine line, since the site is really
designed to sell more Webkinz. But adding immersive
advertising for other products is all about greed."
CCFC reported that Webkinz has, since October, "quietly"
integrated ads into the site, and complained that the
"Parents Area" of the site does not mention that Webkinz
takes advertising. The organization cited two ad
campaigns currently on the site: one promoting the movie
"Alvin and the Chipmunks" (along with promotions for
purchasing chipmunk costumes and food for kids' virtual
Webkinz pets), and one for "The Bee Movie."
Ganz declined to be interviewed about the CCFC campaign,
but Communications Manager Susan McVeigh offered a
corporate statement that stressed that the company "took
a very cautious and considered approach to third-party
advertising." Ganz confirmed that it has had only two
third-party advertisers on the site thus far, and has no
further third-party ads scheduled at this time.
The company added that it considers several criteria in
taking ads. Ads must pass its standards for "quality,
family-friendly products--we would not allow junk food,
products that are violent nor brands and/or products
that are not age-appropriate," Ganz stated.
In addition, Ganz says that it requires that it approve
all ad content (it does not use a second-party
advertising distributor, to ensure that "no
inappropriate ad would ever 'slip by'"); it does not
allow linking off of Webkinz.com, and it will not allow
branding of any prizes won through ads on the site.
"The majority of 'advertising' space remains dedicated
to positive life style messaging (get exercise, eat
fresh fruit, drink milk, get outdoors etc.), and Webkinz
products and features," Ganz added.
Webkins.com, launched in April 2005 and geared to
children six through 12, is the most-visited virtual
world for children in the U.S., according to CCFC. As of
2006, the site had a million online accounts. Ganz
subsequently stopped releasing online and sales figures.
However, Nielsen//NetRatings showed the site drawing
over 4 million users in May.
At least a million of the toys have been sold in
Hallmark and other specialty stores and online since the
launch; some estimates put the number at double that.
Online, newly released animal toys are going for between
about $15 and $25. In Wired, Toy Wishes editor Jim
Silver estimated Webkinz's 2006 sales at $100 million.
In addition to the toys, and now advertising, Ganz is
realizing revenue by charging a fee to continue using
the site once an individual user has been active for a
year.
What are the odds that CCFC's efforts will succeed? Is
Ganz risking killing the golden goose (or bear or collie
or whatever)?
Branding expert Laura Ries, a parent with considerable
firsthand exposure to the Webkinz craze, says that the
decision to begin taking advertising on a
site--particularly a paid-for site--is "certainly
serious." Whereas advertising is part of the implicit
bargain on a free-content site, any paid site, and
certainly one for kids, needs to carefully consider the
pros and cons of potentially changing the user
experience, she stresses.
At the same time, Ries, partner in Ries & Ries, says she
thinks it may be unrealistic for parents to expect zero
advertising on most any site--never mind hope to shield
kids from all advertising in today's world. "Do you
think Disney isn't marketing to my kids on their site?,"
she notes, adding that she feels strongly that it's
incumbent on parents to educate children early on, in an
age-appropriate manner, about advertising and how it
works.
Ries says that Webkinz appears to be taking a selective,
"not overwhelming" approach to ads. "Even PBS is taking
advertising or sponsorships now, and in my mind,
Webkinz's approach seems to be akin to that model--at
least as things now stand on the site," she says.
As for damage to the brand, "Webkinz is so powerful now
that, unless they really go overboard--which I doubt
they'll do--people will in all likelihood accept this,"
Ries predicts.
